Politics At Play In World Cup
A THORNY
ISSUE
by Andi Thornhill
IT WAS ONLY a matter of time
before geopolitics entered the World Cup.
Donald Trump, largely a
spectator, found it difficult to keep his mouth quiet when the United States
had to play in the last 16. By his own admission, he asked that red-carded
Folarin Balogun be given a chance to play just because he was too good a player
to miss the match. Whether true or not, all he had to do was to give FIFA
president Gianni Infantino a call and the issue was settled.
The injustice of the move,
questioned by UEFA (Union of European Football Associations) and others fell on
death ears.
Trump had spoken and that was
that.
It didn’t start there.
FIFA had also agreed to give
Cristiano Ronaldo a free pass before the World Cup, lifting a
suspension for the first game in this campaign.
He was suspended for the first
game for an elbow on Irishman Dara O’Shea but Trump made another
untimely intervention for his friend.
The point is that both decisions
seemed unconstitutional but FIFA allowed both and the credibility of the
organisation suffered as a result. The question to be asked where football’s
biggest body is going after these two blunders? Can it live with the shame it
has committed and will FIFA ever be free of these decisions made in the name of
international football?
Protest
Jack Warner has said that he will
be launching a protest.
The first vote will be mine –
notwithstanding Infantino was high on the list of those who wanted Warner out.
If you are comfortable with what Trump has done, you can’t be sitting without
any pressure because you have the numbers.
Infantino, under normal
circumstances, should be swept aside next year when he seeks another mandate
but I think he will prevail again. UEFA is only one body that is likely to
resist the missteps of Infantino and the Trump agenda which is clear to see, back
me and you’ll succeed.
Iran felt all the pressure of the
geopolitics and nobody stood up for them.
Another thing is that Infantino
wants to bring 64 countries for the next World Cup and he
probably will succeed. What chance of Barbados coming good and at what cost?
By the time the next edition is
printed, it will all be done. One thing I have seen clearly is that the World
Cup is for the big countries. Were it not so, I can see that a couple
of the smaller countries would have been in the quarterfinals.
As it stands, they were
seemingly deprived by the VAR (Video Assistant Referee) system and a few
indecisive referees. That’s how poor the systems are. Did Norway deserve to
lose to England? They played better than England and were denied when the ball
struck the fire alarm on its way to Jude Bellingham and he scored their first
goal.
That’s the break some of the
powerhouses are able to get without scrutiny. Was Mo Salah pushed aside
when Argentina pressed for the third goal?
These are just two of the
misdemeanours that occurred and changed the games. Better must come when there
is so much at stake.
Geopolitics is at play and I
guess it will loom large for Argentina and France.
Andi Thornhill is an
award-winning, experienced freelance sports journalist and broadcaster.
Email: andithornhill@live.com
Nation Newspaper, Barbados Wednesday July 15th. 2026
Mahogany Coconut Note :
Jack Warner who says he will be launching a protest , is a former FIFA Vice President.
Mr. Warner is a Trinidadian.
Comments