Disrespect of Women Reaches New Heights
The behavior of a Queens Counsel toward a female judge, in
Barbados, is another manifestation of the disrespect being displayed toward our
women. According to published reports, the Queens Counsel demonstrated his displeasure
with the judge by lifting his robe,backing the judge, bending over and inviting her to kiss a
part of his anatomy.
This single act reveals that disrespect for our women is now
rampant at all social and educational levels. We will remain in the forefront
of calling for our women to be respected but there is a bigger picture emerging
here. Our Caribbean societies have always elevated some professions beyond
godlike status. The medical and legal professions have been the chief beneficiaries
of such adulation.
While we have had the occasional professional problems with
our doctors, we suggest that such incidents have been far from widespread. We
can therefore, with some objectivity, concur that the medical professional has
maintained high professional standards. However we are aware that some will
suggest, that unprofessional conduct within the medical professional is not
usually made public.
However, we have the legal professionals constantly escaping
censorship for unprofessional behavior. Sometimes they are given a slap on the
risk or allowed to flee the country, leaving clients in financial shambles. It is
essentially a group with entrenched support in the now powerful political managerial
class. To put it bluntly, they are allowed to behave as if they are above the
same legal system, they were trained to protect.
While we do not claim to be experts on the legal profession,
we are aware that a Queens Counsel is considered to be a senior lawyer and have
some professional privileges. We also understand that their fees reflect their
professional elevation. We are therefore concerned that their needs to be better
screening of those being elevated to the professional heights they enjoy.
While the Chief Justice may be expected to become involved in
this sordid issue, we are uncertain of his reach. While we will expect him to
at least comment, it will be folly to put pressure on him when this kind of
professional vulgarity surfaces. We must bear in mind that this is more of a
physical and personal assault on the judge than an outright legal question. We
however believe that if a professional code of conduct has been seriously breached,
that nothing short of censorship and the removal of Queens Counsel privileges
are to be expected.
Comments