Tourism Victim of Governments'/Industry Failures
The tourism industry is a sector
of the leisure industry. Contrary to popular opinion, the Caribbean is not the
exclusive reserve of white sands and blue waters. We were not that fortunate when
the world was created. We are therefore
in competition with ourselves in the Caribbean and tourists/leisure
destinations worldwide.
Carnivals and festivals are also magnets for
those seeking leisure. Although the Trinidad Carnival has been compared with
others and some of its designers/band leaders have achieved international fame;
we cannot claim it is the worldwide leader in this category. The Crop Over
festival in Barbados is a major attraction for those living in the Diaspora,
but it is still unclear as to the direction it is taking or being led. We can
say that there has been no clear international marketing plan for Crop Over,
since it was revitalized over forty years ago.
We are pursuing heritage tourism
in Barbados; in Guyana attempts are being made to market their vast outdoors
and eco- tourism and efforts are afoot in Dominica in similar areas. From this
brief introduction, we can suggest that the entire Caribbean has a rich culture
and can attract tourists and leisure seekers. The question is: Why an island
such as Barbados, that had a jump start in this industry over sixty years ago,
cannot or has not developed a tourism product that is attractive enough to
ensure greater economic benefits.
We suggest there was a myopic
view which held that tourists will have been forever attracted to white sands,
blue waters and smiling faces. Research will show that although these seemingly
simple factors do contribute, they certainly are not the domain of Barbados
alone. Quite frankly, in recent times, the smiling faces have given way to some
rather melancholy views about the industry; the white sands have receded because
of poor environmental management and in the 70’s and 80’s , hoteliers in cahoots with
successive governments branded the beaches as major areas of visitor
harassment.
In a sinister attempt to destroy
the economic activity of beach vendors, they succeeded in driving an almost unmovable
psychological barrier between locals and visitors. The protest was captured in
the Mighty Gabby’s calypso classic “Jack”, where the locals reminded the
political managerial class and its cohorts that the beach “belong to we”. We
are of the opinion that the hoteliers branded decent, honest, hardworking young
Barbadian business people as negatives because they wanted to control the
spending power of the tourists, since many hotels had boutiques, selling the
same jewelry and other items the vendors were pedaling.
The refusal of the hoteliers and successive
governments, to establish the vital link of agriculture and tourism also
retarded the growth of the industry and prevented locals from sharing in its
profits. Tourists were complaining of the high price of food and beverages for
many years. However, it was believed that the beaches and sunshine “will keep
them coming”. Greed and political inaction, guaranteed that local cuisine was
not aggressively promoted and most hotels maintained foreign based menus,
thereby sucking a great deal of foreign exchange out of the economy. Many
locals were unaware that hotels were importing huge amounts of fish because the
local fishing industry could not meet supply. Had the governments (BLP/DLP)
invested or supported the development of a modern fishing industry, millions in
foreign exchange would have been saved.
We are also aware that when poor
marketing and political inaction caught up with the industry, hoteliers blamed its failures on the wages of hotel workers. They started to pressure
governments and unions about how expensive Barbadian workers were. In other
words they convinced the political managerial class that the industry could
only survive with a cheaper work force.
They complained it could only survive with lower electricity rates. They complained that crime was killing the
industry. Our research reveals that Barbados has one of the lowest crime rates
against tourists/visitors worldwide; we also know that middle management hotel
salaries are not excessive. In terms of maids and other auxiliary staff, it is
known that the level of education they have is far superior to similar workers
in the industry in other countries. Furthermore, hotels in other countries
employ emigrant workers at below minimum wages.
We are therefore convinced that
if the tourism industry is in intensive care, it is a result of the following:
Political inaction;
Failure of hoteliers in good
times to modernize and upgrade their plants;
A psychological disconnect
between locals and the industry because honest economic activity was sabotaged;
Extremely poor marketing at both
the governmental and industry levels;
Failure to link agriculture and
tourism when the industry was enjoying decades of growth;
Poor management of the
environment;
Tardiness by both government and
industry in promoting eco/heritage tourism;
Unnecessary blame of workers for
government/ hoteliers failures.
We note efforts to correct many
of the factors mentioned above. We can
only hope they will not take another sixty years to bear fruit. We therefore
conclude that political inertia and the crowding of state tourism agencies with
political / party personnel, coupled with poor marketing and visionless
management of hoteliers, squandered the great head start Barbados had in this
multi-billion dollar industry. We hope other Caribbean islands, as they build their
tourism product will look at the Barbados model of non-development, in this industry,
and avoid the same mistakes.
Comments