|
National Flag Trinidad and Tobago |
Young, black and
in trouble
By Rolph Balgobin
Story Created: Jul 22, 2013 at 8:19 PM ECT
Story Updated: Jul 22, 2013 at 10:25 PM ECT
In Pretoria, perhaps
the world’s most prominent leader against racism may be working out his
karma, preparing to die. His greatest legacy is Nelson Mandela’s impact on
the scourge of bigotry that continues to jaundice our views of each other.
Not so far away, in
Italy, a demonstration of racism’s durability manifests in the case of Cecile
Kyenge, a Congolese doctor. A member of the Italian cabinet, she has
been publicly likened to an orangutan by Senator Roberto Calderoli. Dolores
Valandro, an Italian member of the Northern League in the European
Parliament, suggested Ms Kyenge be raped “so she can understand what victims
of atrocious crimes feel’’.
Also in Italy,
footballer Mario Balotelli endures monkey chants. In England, Luis
Suarez calls Patrice Evra a “negrito’’, and national team captain John Terry
calls Anton Ferdinand a “f….g black c...’’.
Thousands of miles
away, in a country with a half white president, a young man is killed for
being black. Armed with Skittles and a drink, Trayvon Martin died by
bullet, at 17 years old, a victim of racial profiling.
Military operators
often say that in a civilian space and in a violent confrontation, better be
tried by 12 than carried by six. Meaning it is better to be the only
one alive to tell your story to a jury of 12, than have six pallbearers carry
you to your grave. This worked for George Zimmerman, Mr Martin’s
killer.
Further west,
unintentionally humorous was reporting on the crash of an Asiana Airlines
flight in San Francisco airport, pilot names were reported by KTVU News as
Captain Sum Ting Wong, Wi Tu Lo and Ho Lee Fuk.
It is interesting
how lightly racist aggressors get off, while victims nurse bruises for a
lifetime, or pay with their lives. Senator Calderoli keeps his job, UEFA’s
president Michel Platini tells Mr Balotelli to play on, Mr Suarez and Mr
Terry continue their lucrative careers, KTVU keeps broadcasting, Trayvon
Martin’s character is posthumously assaulted, and his killer is both alive
and free.
A couple thousand
miles south, in Trinidad, halfway up the Uriah Butler Highway, two billboards
stand. One features Bollywood movie star Shah Rukh Khan, the other an
anonymous woman. Mr Khan is advertising “Fair and Handsome’’, the woman
on the opposite side, a version for women. Both ads suggest they make
your complexion lighter.
Why would colour be
important? In India, when Unilever promoted “Fair and Lovely’’, Brinda
Karat, general secretary of the All India Democratic Women’s Congress, called
their advertising campaign ‘‘highly racist’’. Unilever countered that
complexion was an Asian standard of beauty and that such products provided
choice and economic empowerment for women.
Not just in India,
apparently. Such products are now advertised here, without a peep from
Mr Kambon, Mr Cudjoe, Ms Brown, NJAC, the SDMS or GOPIO. Of course the
importance of whitening is all about disempowerment and the inherited
psychosis of post-empire societies still dominated by interests aligned to
skin colour. You would think that somebody in a nation defined by
slavery and indentureship might say something, but you’d be wrong.
Perhaps the general
muteness is testament to an entrenched assumption, now latent if not innate,
that whiter is better here. Or is it that we all know how odious racism
is but secretly desire to join the closed society and this exclusive club, so
we will take whatever help we can get?
Whatever the
reasons, we have yet to have a mature conversation about race, ethnicity and
class in Trinidad and Tobago. Racism is learned, and our intellectual
and religious leaders have not provided antidotes, so we continue to be
highly uninformed about the opportunities presented by our diversity as well
as our commonality.
This is a sad
reflection on all our leaders, especially politicians. Carnival in all
its uncoordinated and creative glory has done more to bring ethnicities
together than any government policy we have ever had.
Maybe the Ganges
meets the Nile, Thames, Seine, Tigris and Euphrates in the local church,
synagogue, mosque and mandir? Not really. There is a clear ethnic
and class distinction even in religious participation that may be
imperceptible but is not wholly invisible. In an environment where ethnicity
can influence or determine class, religion needs to do much more than nurture
the existing racist tendencies in our society by permitting such barriers to
continue within their respective domains.
Another dimension of
this is the problem of the young black male. This is an Afro-Trini
difficulty, the most pronounced expressions of which are low rates of
academic success and high incidence of violent crime. The statistics
suggest these men appear to be killing people, especially each other, and
making an outsized contribution to crime statistics both as criminal and
victim. Young, black men have become something to in our society.
When an Afro-Trini
kills another, he plays right into the hands of those who fear him the most
and help him the least. Add radicalised religion and you develop an
anti-society which is increasingly hostile to the mainstream. Gypsy’s
“little black boy’’ is marginalised and disproportionately populates the
alternative, criminal society which now threatens our stability and
democracy.
To beat this threat
we have to depopulate this anti-society.
The story of our
youth, and the young Afro-Trini man particularly, is far from conclusion, and
it need not be a macabre one. The many decent young men of all races in
this society, including Afro-Trinis, cannot continue to be defined by a
recalcitrant but growing minority.
We need a national
conversation about the youth in our society and about the young Afro-Trini
male in particular. This discussion needs to start with the Afro-Trini
community taking responsibility for its young men. Everyone else must support
strongly. His plight, challenges and opportunities are our own. His fate will
define ours.
We must move beyond
helplessness towards positive engagement. We need a more general
response, one with love and care, which leans heavily on spirituality and
faith as well as more conventional mechanisms. If we do not act in
concert to help young men in general and young black men specifically, he
will continue to be both aggressor (real and imagined) as well as victim, as
will we all.
• Rolph Balgobin is
an
independent
senator
|
Comments