No To Single-Sex Schools
Caribbean School Children |
Some of our well intentioned Caribbean citizens are blaming
co-education as the fountain from which many of our problems within the school
system and society springs. We beg to respectfully differ. In their zeal to
solve the problems, they are calling for the re-introduction of single-sex
schools. This will be an extremely backward step, taking into consideration, limited
resources and the fact that there is no empirical evidence that co-education
has caused any widespread problems within our Caribbean school system.
The forerunner to the call for the reintroduction of single –sex
schools, was the unfair blame put on female teachers by those who claim, that
our female teachers are favoring the girl students and “turning the boys into
sissies”. As ludicrous as this essentially sexist position is; it has gained
considerable momentum within some Caribbean countries. Those who hold this position
have buttressed their claim by pointing to the fact that girls, especially at
the primary school level, were doing better in the elitist eleven plus exams
that are used to transfer our children to secondary schools. We have
unapologetically denounced these exams in a recent article.
They opine that the girls are distracting influences on the
boy students and that the boys are not paying attention in class. They also
forcibly argue that boys develop much slower than girls and the added
distraction is a double blow and obstacle to their progress. Again, there is no
empirical evidence to fortify their positions but that does not deter the
purveyors of this argument.
We are of the view that for the last twenty five years or so,
our Caribbean women have been taking advantage of the many opportunities
available to improve their education. The young men have found more comfort in
sitting on the block, waiting on opportunity to drop like manna from the
heavens. They are then enticed into involvement in drugs and other aspects of
social deviancy. The crime statistics will support our position.
We fail to understand, how single sex schools or more male
teachers will in any profound way stop the negative trends that our now
enveloping our boys, who will eventually become the men in our societies. Also,
it is rather interesting that the Caribbean , has very few women in the highest political
offices(Prime Ministers) who can actually influence education strategy but we
want to blame women for the failures. We still have a male dominated political culture
and they are proving to be rather inferior leaders at this point in time. Why
blame our women if the men cannot get it right?
Furthermore, single –sex schools will have to deal with the
changing social trends in relation to homosexual students and so on. Those who
believe that single sex schools will mean students having less interest in sex
are basing their limited view on heterosexual activity but we have to realize that
in single sex schools sexual activity/curiosity will not decrease – it will just
be homosexual.
It is therefore clear that on all counts, the reintroduction
of single sex schools will not have any dramatically positive influence or
results. The world has changed since the days when it was thought that women
were mere sex objects and nothing more than distractions. We need to accept
that the advances made by women over the last fifty years have been more of a
benefit to our men than a curse.
We strongly believe that our young Caribbean citizens must
continue to study together, work together and build the New Caribbean Nation. Separating
them at young and impressionable ages would rob them of the modern
socialization process that will stand them in good stead as they move into manhood
and womanhood.
Let us not panic and turn back the clock in order to appease
those who simply yearn for what they call the “good old days”. We have to remind
them that there are better days ahead. Our boys and girls are doing quite well learning,
playing and co-existing in their school environments. Let us resist single sex
schools and continue with co-education.
Comments